Hi, just one more note: Am Montag, den 15.02.2010, 11:56 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > > We could consider using dh_haskell_provides also for ghc6 and ghc6-prof, > > so that they list the ABI is they provide. Any other ideas? > > I really think we need to run dh_haskell_provides in ghc6: Haskell > packages just don’t work with non-matching ABI ids, even for base, so > the packaging relations should reflect that. > > Note that haskell-devscripts is probably not a good build-depends for > ghc6 (it depends on ghc6, haddock and hscolour). But I guess > dh_haskell_provides could be copied to ghc6 without a problem. Note that this does not require changes to haskell-devscripts or any library package, and that they will make use of the hash-based provides in ghc6 once such a ghc6 is used on the buildd. I’m therefore not scheduling any binNMUs now. Ideally, we push a ghc6 with such provides ASAP, and then schedule the required binNMUs and continue the sourceful uploads. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil