Hi Kaol, Am Montag, den 07.12.2009, 20:23 +0200 schrieb Kari Pahula: > On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 08:39:58PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Looks like we have some rather big issue with how we generated our > > binary dependencies, as they are not sufficient to guarantee working > > dependencies. This is the situation: > > Sounds like #518308. correct, although I’d really like to see a solution tied as close as possible to who GHC determines buildability, i.e. a solution based on the hash. I think you once mentioned that you did some work on a ghc6-6.12 package. Do you manager your ghc6 packaging in some VCS? I’d also like to play around with it a bit. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil