Hi, Am Sonntag, den 18.10.2009, 17:07 -0200 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: > Em Dom, 2009-08-16 às 17:52 +0200, Joachim Breitner escreveu: > (...) > > there are some variations on the -doc package name in Debian, and > > changing it is probably not viable at the moment (going through NEW and > > all). > > Is this still your opinion? I think it'd be better to have a standard > format of package names than to change haskell-devscripts, even if doing > this would take some time. It’s still my opinion, but I’m not passionate about it: If someone else thinks its worth going for, and will do the work (including possible discussions with ftp-master or so), I’ll happily do the uploading. BTW, which name is better? libghc6-*-doc or haskell-doc? Boths have its merits? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil