On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 09:58:36AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=cpphs > and others that most of our packages are priority optional, but depend > on libffi5 which is priority extra. The dependency comes from > dpkg-shlibdeps – maybe it is incorrect? If not, we should change the > priority of all our packages to extra with the next round of uploads. I'd suggest investigating bumping libffi5 to optional before a mass priority change. -- Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Jyväskylä, Finland http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.fi/newblog/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/antti-juhani/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature