Re: Error building package
Em Qui, 2009-03-12 às 17:35 +1100, Trent W. Buck escreveu:
> Magnus Therning <magnus@therning.org> writes:
> > I'd recommend starting over, using hlibrary.mk instead. Here's a
> > shameless plug for my own blog post:
> > http://therning.org/magnus/archives/458
>
> For my (non-Haskell library) packages, I have switched from using CDBS
> to dh(1), a new feature in debhelper (>= 7). In general I have found
> dh(1) makefiles easier to maintain because they have fewer "magic
> variables".
>
> Have you found time to look into the viability of using dh(1) for
> Haskell libraries? If so, and you decided against it, would you please
> outline the reasons?
There's a dh addon in haskell-devscripts, which I wrote, but hlibrary.mk
is being more actively maintained and is compatible with the current
policy, while dh_haskell* and the dh addon still install files in old
places.
At first I thought it was a good idea to have more than one option to
build haskell packages, but now I think it'll be difficult to maintain,
cause it'll cause double work at each haskell policy change.
Greetings.
--
marcot
http://marcot.iaaeee.org/
Reply to: