[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#541836: Suggests wrong -doc package


Am Sonntag, den 18.10.2009, 17:07 -0200 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
> Em Dom, 2009-08-16 às 17:52 +0200, Joachim Breitner escreveu:
> (...)
> > there are some variations on the -doc package name in Debian, and
> > changing it is probably not viable at the moment (going through NEW and
> > all).
> Is this still your opinion?  I think it'd be better to have a standard
> format of package names than to change haskell-devscripts, even if doing
> this would take some time.

It’s still my opinion, but I’m not passionate about it: If someone else
thinks its worth going for, and will do the work (including possible
discussions with ftp-master or so), I’ll happily do the uploading.

BTW, which name is better? libghc6-*-doc or haskell-doc? Boths have its


Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Reply to: