Re: Bug#537705: ITP: agda-executable -- Commandline interface to Agda -- a dependently typed functional programming language and proof assistant
Wolfgang Jeltsch <g9ks157k@acme.softbase.org> writes:
> Am Montag, 20. Juli 2009 12:23 schrieb Iain Lane:
>> * Package name : agda-executable
>
> Why agda-exectuable? Wouldn’t it be more common to name this package agda-cli?
Why can't it just be "agda"? Even if there's a separate library
package, that would have the source name "haskell-agda" and binary names
"libghc6-agda-{dev,prof,doc}", so there'd be no conflict.
Reply to: