[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#537705: ITP: agda-executable -- Commandline interface to Agda -- a dependently typed functional programming language and proof assistant

Wolfgang Jeltsch <g9ks157k@acme.softbase.org> writes:

> Am Montag, 20. Juli 2009 12:23 schrieb Iain Lane:
>> * Package name    : agda-executable
> Why agda-exectuable? Wouldn’t it be more common to name this package agda-cli? 

Why can't it just be "agda"?  Even if there's a separate library
package, that would have the source name "haskell-agda" and binary names
"libghc6-agda-{dev,prof,doc}", so there'd be no conflict.

Reply to: