On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 02:28:32PM +0300, Kari Pahula wrote:
> I've just uploaded a new ghc6 version to unstable. All Haskell
> libraries will need to be rebuilt against it. The following Haskell
> libraries were built successfully against 6.10.1, so I'm fairly
> certain that they should just build with 6.10.3, too.
>
> I've updated some libraries to new upstream versions and made a
> sourceful upload of those. Also, I'll need to review the glut binding
> and parsec a bit before updating those. The rest are still built
> against 6.8 and the toolchain from back then, so they may not work.
> They'll probably need sourceful uploads.
>
> RMs, is the following OK with you?
Yes, thanks. And thanks you very much for preparing the list in the
wb format.
Please note, though, that the syntax is slightly different:
> nmu . haskell-arrows_0.4.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against GHC 6.10.3'
gets
> nmu haskell-arrows_0.4.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against GHC 6.10.3'
And it would be cool if you could review the result a bit, especially
the dep-waits on arches where no binNMU was possible because the binNMU
target was not yet built anyway.[*]
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
[*] I suppose most of those don't have ghc anyway. That's somehow the
drawback of using ALL and having them present in the DB.
--
.''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager
`. `' xmpp:phil@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin
`- finger pkern/key@db.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature