On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 02:28:32PM +0300, Kari Pahula wrote: > I've just uploaded a new ghc6 version to unstable. All Haskell > libraries will need to be rebuilt against it. The following Haskell > libraries were built successfully against 6.10.1, so I'm fairly > certain that they should just build with 6.10.3, too. > > I've updated some libraries to new upstream versions and made a > sourceful upload of those. Also, I'll need to review the glut binding > and parsec a bit before updating those. The rest are still built > against 6.8 and the toolchain from back then, so they may not work. > They'll probably need sourceful uploads. > > RMs, is the following OK with you? Yes, thanks. And thanks you very much for preparing the list in the wb format. Please note, though, that the syntax is slightly different: > nmu . haskell-arrows_0.4.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against GHC 6.10.3' gets > nmu haskell-arrows_0.4.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against GHC 6.10.3' And it would be cool if you could review the result a bit, especially the dep-waits on arches where no binNMU was possible because the binNMU target was not yet built anyway.[*] Kind regards, Philipp Kern [*] I suppose most of those don't have ghc anyway. That's somehow the drawback of using ALL and having them present in the DB. -- .''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:phil@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `- finger pkern/key@db.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature