[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New version of zlib

Hello Joachim,

Em Sáb, 2009-02-28 às 16:12 +0100, Joachim Breitner escreveu:
> Am Freitag, den 27.02.2009, 11:55 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 26.02.2009, 22:40 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
> > Silva:
> > > the new version of zlib is available at
> > > http://debian.holoscopio.com/libghc6-zlib/ .  Joachim, can you please
> > > upload it to me?
> it’s already uploaded... but I noticed just now that you changed the
> source package name to libghc6-zlib. What is the rationale for that?

As there's no package for zlib in another compiler, such as hugs, I
thought that libghc6 would be a better prefix than haskell, cause it's
more precise.  Do you think it's a bad idea?

> What’s wrong with the common haskell-<cabal package name>?

Nothing wrong with it.

> Generally, I think, ftp-masters and bts admins do not like it when
> source package names change, unless for very good reasons.

I didn't knew that.  I'll try to avoid it from now.  About zlib, should
I change it back?

Should I keep gtk2hs as it is, instead of changing it to haskell-gtk2hs
or libghc6-gtk2hs?


Reply to: