Re: re : Opie packages
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 08:20:24AM -0600, Jeremy Turner wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 7:34 AM
> > To: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Subject: re : Opie packages
> > Hm. "op-" may be a bit too far from "opie-".
> > /me was thinking about "pda-opie-", which I did not see
> > proposed.
> What about dz-* for debian Zaurus? Or do-* for debian opie?
dz-* is probably not the best as this is not Zaurus specific. do-* is good.
pda-opie-* just sounds like we are adding too much to the package name...we'll
end up with things like pda-opie-tinykate-syntax-miscdev which to me just
seems way too long.
I personally thing that we need to replace opie- with a single short name.
op- (IMO) is not too far from opie- as it sounds the same. :) (At least
in English it does. hehe)
Ivan E. Moore II
GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD