* On 2023 17 Sep 15:45 -0500, tony mancill wrote: > On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 03:45:53AM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > Yes, backports would be quite useful since I already have it enabled. > > > > > Which architecture are you looking for? > > > > I will use it on amd64, which is rather standard fare these days. > > I have prepared a package for bookworm-backports, but won't be able to > upload it until the 2.7.0~rc2 package in unstable migrates to testing, a > few days from now. > > In the meantime, you can find amd64 binary packages for bookworm here: > > https://people.debian.org/~tmancill/wsjtx-1051182/ Thanks, Tony. So far, so good on 10m FT8. 73, Nate -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." Web: https://www.n0nb.us Projects: https://github.com/N0NB GPG fingerprint: 82D6 4F6B 0E67 CD41 F689 BBA6 FB2C 5130 D55A 8819
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature