Bug#1030236: welle.io: welle-cli leaks memory
Package: welle.io
Version: 2.4+ds-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
running '/usr/bin/welle-cli -c 9B -p Absolut OLDIE' or any other station makes the system use up all memory.
top output after a few seconds:
60894 deyke 20 0 2805952 1.7g 10796 R 117.0 11.1 2:08.55 welle-cli
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
APT prefers stable-security
APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages welle.io depends on:
ii libairspy0 1.0.10-2+b1
ii libasound2 1.2.8-1+b1
ii libc6 2.36-8
ii libfaad2 2.10.1-1
ii libfftw3-single3 3.3.10-1
ii libgcc-s1 12.2.0-14
ii libmp3lame0 3.100-6
ii libmpg123-0 1.31.2-1
ii libqt5charts5 5.15.8-2
ii libqt5core5a 5.15.8+dfsg-2
ii libqt5dbus5 5.15.8+dfsg-2
ii libqt5gui5 5.15.8+dfsg-2
ii libqt5multimedia5 5.15.8-2
ii libqt5multimedia5-plugins 5.15.8-2
ii libqt5qml5 5.15.8+dfsg-2
ii libqt5quick5 5.15.8+dfsg-2
ii libqt5quickcontrols2-5 5.15.8+dfsg-2
ii libqt5widgets5 5.15.8+dfsg-2
ii librtlsdr0 0.6.0-4
ii libsoapysdr0.8 0.8.1-2+b2
ii libstdc++6 12.2.0-14
ii qml-module-qt-labs-settings 5.15.8+dfsg-2
ii qml-module-qtcharts 5.15.8-2
ii qml-module-qtgraphicaleffects 5.15.8-2
ii qml-module-qtquick-controls 5.15.8-2
ii qml-module-qtquick-controls2 5.15.8+dfsg-2
ii qml-module-qtquick-dialogs 5.15.8-2
ii qml-module-qtquick-layouts 5.15.8+dfsg-2
ii qml-module-qtquick-localstorage 5.15.8+dfsg-2
ii qml-module-qtquick-privatewidgets 5.15.8-2
ii qml-module-qtquick-templates2 5.15.8+dfsg-2
ii qml-module-qtquick-window2 5.15.8+dfsg-2
ii qml-module-qtquick2 5.15.8+dfsg-2
welle.io recommends no packages.
welle.io suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Reply to: