Re: What was

To: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>, Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org>
Cc: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>, Debian Hamradio Maintainers <debian-hams@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: What was
From: David Ranch <dranch@trinnet.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2021 10:40:59 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 6e0d7d6e-b11b-40ac-2ab1-dc4f7f3394cd@trinnet.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 878s996g8k.fsf@gag.com>
References: <[🔎] 74918de0-0e17-d3fe-f0c8-746302949ef5@trinnet.net> <[🔎] CAO6P2QQsbg5OJJeGxOtSdSrs7iUOCysCXEGGdWVsoOByYMueNw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAO6P2QQO6_uSEorTYojYXN60w0XeECNXhCY_FUO5tgq7reXhnA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 8aad7744-eb45-3ed3-abc6-3b9e8ae4c48c@trinnet.net> <[🔎] 878s996g8k.fsf@gag.com>

Hello Bdale,

Thank you for the response. Are you willing to upload the package? I'm just trying to get this moving as it sounds like the bullseye cutoff is coming up.

--David

On 01/03/2021 10:13 AM, Bdale Garbee wrote:

David Ranch <dranch@trinnet.net> writes:

Thank you for the sleuthing and yes, it seems like the issue was 
resolved back in 2012.  Is there an official process to ask for someone 
to re-add this package into the Debian packaging system?

I don't know of any "special" procedure .. any DD just needs to build
and upload a new version of the package.  It'll likely go through NEW
processing, but there's no particular reason it can't be returned to the
archive if it meets current policy.

Bdale

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What was
  - From: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
- Re: What was
  - From: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>

References:
- What was
  - From: David Ranch <dranch@trinnet.net>
- Re: What was
  - From: Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org>
- Re: What was
  - From: Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org>
- Re: What was
  - From: David Ranch <dranch@trinnet.net>
- Re: What was
  - From: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>

Prev by Date: Re: What was
Next by Date: Re: ax25mail-utils is marked for autoremoval from testing
Previous by thread: Re: What was
Next by thread: Re: What was
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread