[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#971469: marked as done (gnss-sdr: autopkgtest must be marked superficial)



Your message dated Tue, 24 Aug 2021 16:04:20 +0000
with message-id <E1mIYuS-00068R-R8@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#971469: fixed in gnss-sdr 0.0.15-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #971469,
regarding gnss-sdr: autopkgtest must be marked superficial
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
971469: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971469
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gnss-sdr
Severity: important
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elbrus@debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in gnss-sdr is running a
trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:

	- testcommand: gnss-sdr --version

Executing that command is considered to be a trivial test, which
does not provide significant coverage for a package as a whole.
But these tests are a useful way to detect regressions in dependencies
and prevent them from breaking your package.

However, it is important that we are realistic about the level of
test coverage provided by these commands: most regressions cannot be
detected in this way. So it is not appropriate for packages with only
superficial tests to have the reduced migration time to migrate from
unstable to testing as that means less opportunity for testing by users
compared to the package with no tests.

To support this, the keyword "Restrictions: superficial" has been
defined [1]. Packages where all tests are marked with this keyword are not
considered for the reduced migration age from unstable to testing, and
will not be allowed to migrate automatically in later stages of the
freeze [2].

Its always better to have more extensive testing than having
superficial testing, which again is better than having no test.

Please consider i) Adding a non-trivial test, and/or ii) Mark the
trivial test with "Restrictions: superficial", similar to
[3] or [4].

The Release Team has listed this issue in the list of Release Critical
Issues for bullseye [5] and has mentioned that the test must be marked
superficial if it is not testing one of its own installed binary
packages in some way. As a result, the severity of this bug report might
be increased to serious in future.

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/blob/master/doc/README.package-tests.rst#defined-restrictions
[2] https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html
[3] https://salsa.debian.org/utopia-team/dbus/-/commit/a80908df7d119b181eec5eb0542634a30c2ad468
[4] https://salsa.debian.org/apparmor-team/apparmor/-/commit/580667513a097088ebe579884b38ac8d8666d3b3
[5] https://release.debian.org/bullseye/rc_policy.txt


--
Regards
Sudip

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gnss-sdr
Source-Version: 0.0.15-1
Done: Carles Fernandez <carles.fernandez@cttc.es>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnss-sdr, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 971469@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Carles Fernandez <carles.fernandez@cttc.es> (supplier of updated gnss-sdr package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:04:20 +0200
Source: gnss-sdr
Architecture: source
Version: 0.0.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Hamradio Maintainers <debian-hams@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Carles Fernandez <carles.fernandez@cttc.es>
Closes: 971469
Changes:
 gnss-sdr (0.0.15-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * First release of upstream version 0.0.15
   * Remove gr-iio and libiio-dev for hurd-i386 and sh4
   * Remove libad9361-dev for hurd-i386
   * Update debian/upstream/metadata
   * Add Restrictions: superficial to debian/tests/control (Closes: bug#971469)
Checksums-Sha1:
 f84f6c68c390c083ba6205519e32be2e4bab670d 2752 gnss-sdr_0.0.15-1.dsc
 5ab5f18e9664238c2a07a3b06e80af5f3f9001ac 4359604 gnss-sdr_0.0.15.orig.tar.gz
 08552ac4d1e47dd46a64132137e6c192ab3fc941 833 gnss-sdr_0.0.15.orig.tar.gz.asc
 c142ea2d5870f182067bbbdd0f55ef54a63fdad0 13728 gnss-sdr_0.0.15-1.debian.tar.xz
 f0f7211cd4c1c433f08270f81937894263adb9e3 16519 gnss-sdr_0.0.15-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 aa1197027343b866f7aa7bc75fe529e29106debccef6b4b12e61aea9fa6b2e5c 2752 gnss-sdr_0.0.15-1.dsc
 7e910f9e6302c7c8023aae22ad1be3d6e44acdf88424e05daf2c0dec4e8fd8b4 4359604 gnss-sdr_0.0.15.orig.tar.gz
 bcdf95b3731b8f6a4f73fbcd3d8a2325f2cc2e0e12f85f2b2ea73c0616823a3b 833 gnss-sdr_0.0.15.orig.tar.gz.asc
 bca48d605a8b5c48e6c59ccf1e97b35cea7873951ac0bff503b40df56be2f66f 13728 gnss-sdr_0.0.15-1.debian.tar.xz
 4d27d96ad856aa0b3c3816c14889ba1076cd7214a3861961a220465bf1f37a31 16519 gnss-sdr_0.0.15-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 4f9a6d04fc8fb18e8bd51dcb152513ed 2752 hamradio optional gnss-sdr_0.0.15-1.dsc
 9e439c4d54095b1360cd41b7752da31f 4359604 hamradio optional gnss-sdr_0.0.15.orig.tar.gz
 43801a612f7b6e05684829aee2066213 833 hamradio optional gnss-sdr_0.0.15.orig.tar.gz.asc
 1a01f73824ca3c36b262cfc3689d4927 13728 hamradio optional gnss-sdr_0.0.15-1.debian.tar.xz
 deb35a29b5ade50dae43a573d64b9a88 16519 hamradio optional gnss-sdr_0.0.15-1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEkjZVexcMh/iCHArDweDZLphvfH4FAmElFBYACgkQweDZLphv
fH6kqQ/+JUvbpehP+NA9RagvDm3WIfS46TvL+/ATCluFMw2Uab3cG7X/2/xNTMv+
wttVGP7wNabOhZUTepsEsxcfjXrFgrRB371r2j5ADsyaSXdu/eZCVFtP4Q70a68s
AdC5A1qnbK84J7C+eI75vHJx3puiCsJp3PfDUhZTVlK/GJSk2bERxYZIHzsNB0+j
vRLopSbnWqrsHw1aUEKPg2FpdfShh/Mg8FTfIF2I7C80E0AuAu8dLRO5Z5FbmaXN
Cibm7NokVOv+1JfqBE/puoiU9dgwelkiam8UuVzkhB43opkSIl/Hehi3kX6C259Y
pYDd4Y54rVDJMJ8rFBXlp1VQpWLqg4WlMNfbXzkpzpJk8TBDa3hP1p1ZVvNI3RWV
zLR/dkdj1VyBr7zmHk1vqFbk7hwJxYDAm22WwAYj2PTRcb17Ss8jJLBKM/UfpXg8
3Bb1XvtORgiifhLPoxnmnicn+ei+Q7NO4pQDdfSqFN6agm9ckKGtHlwzBxX7MALI
YPS8K14awnGan2MjbE25TsF+oTZYPyXdllH8uSd6wZ/9BeZMWGVXVjioryirhkLg
LjSQ9Zhf9ZjE8aBoGzvmlltpj4yRZl3Jt/0nzSZOch0U5PwA/2QsiPRtHIBar12z
/Nl/QD/qNxs1xy3+MT8xKQ7r72BK0RMpJ7B9kWHJiPnfuRb1COk=
=A+En
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: