Hi Steve, On 05-11-2019 21:02, Steve Langasek wrote: > Did it fail in the same way? I did test in a Debian sid environment before > closing, but I didn't record any details, so perhaps my environment was not > up to date in some other way. No, it did not, but the package was still FTBFS-ing, so closing the only FTBFS against the package suggested to me that the package could now be build, hence I reacted on it. I misunderstood your remark to mean that the gcc-9 issue was fixed but that in current sid, the FTBFS is still there, except for a different reason (I understood that the other issue was also fixed). So, we can close this one and reopen another if that makes people happy. Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature