On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 09:20:43PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Steve, > On 05-11-2019 21:02, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Did it fail in the same way? I did test in a Debian sid environment before > > closing, but I didn't record any details, so perhaps my environment was not > > up to date in some other way. > No, it did not, but the package was still FTBFS-ing, so closing the only > FTBFS against the package suggested to me that the package could now be > build, hence I reacted on it. I misunderstood your remark to mean that > the gcc-9 issue was fixed but that in current sid, the FTBFS is still > there, except for a different reason (I understood that the other issue > was also fixed). So, we can close this one and reopen another if that > makes people happy. I didn't reproduce /any/ build failure of gr-hpsdr in my sid environment. But since it was using gcc-9 to build, and it didn't fail to build with a gcc-9 problem, I was confident that this bug was fixed; and if there are other problems, I think they should be separate bug reports. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature