Hi, On 04/08/2019 16:59, Christoph Berg wrote: > Isn't that moving into the wrong direction, FHS-wise? Yes, but I think that if someone really disagrees here then I would want tech-ctte to rule on it or something. Changing all the other packages is going to use up a lot of time that could be used instead for improving the technical quality of the packages through testing, bug squashing and documentation instead of chasing down bugs triggered by moving the whole folder structure. All the other packages use /var/ax25 and have for *decades*. Custom software people build is expecting /var/ax25. > But judging from the file names, these look like they should be in > /usr/share instead. The goal of the bug is to remove the last of /var/lib/ax25 from the archive, if the files move to /usr/share then that is also fine with me. (It does look to be a better place for them, but I don't know what they do or why they are there, maybe there is good reason.) Thanks, Iain.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature