Re: possible package adoption -- aprx
On 20/05/15 19:06, Chris Knadle wrote:
> Just FYI I had a look at the upstream project, and there's no newer
> version of aprx
I checked that too.
> The f4fxl-core file in the upstream tarball looks to me like
> it's a core dump... that's probably shipped in the tarball erroneously.
Agreed, I'll probably email upstream about it together with a few odd
things I've found in the man pages that upset Lintian.
I've also bumped the Standards Version (again) and will check any
consequences.
The only thing that needs a more careful look is the Lintian warning
about "init.d-script-missing-dependency-on-remote_fs".
> The manual for APRX has some contact email addresses on page 6.
> http://ham.zmailer.org/oh2mqk/aprx/aprx-manual.pdf
Thanks, I'll prod the appropriate people.
73, Colin G8TMV
--
Colin Tuckley | +44(0)1223 830814 | PGP/GnuPG Key Id
Debian Developer | +44(0)7799 143369 | 0x38C9D903
24 hours in a day, 24 beers in a case. Coincidence?
Reply to: