[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#714670: marked as done ([twpsk] please transition from lesstif2 to motif)



Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 17:48:58 +0000
with message-id <E1VNRIg-0002Pa-BO@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#714670: fixed in twpsk 4.0-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #714670,
regarding [twpsk] please transition from lesstif2 to motif
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
714670: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714670
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: twpsk
User: openmotif@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 4.0-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmotif@packages.debian.org

Hi Maintainer

The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is destined to be removed from the archive before the release of Jessie. More information can be found in the Debian wiki [1].

Please update your package to build against the motif package instead. In most cases this can be done by simply replacing the build-depends on lesstif2-dev with libmotif-dev, however please do verify proper behaviour before uploading.

Your package appears to have no dependent packages and to not depend on any other lesstif2-dependent packages.

Regards
Paul and Graham

[1] http://wiki.debian.org/lesstif2motifTransition

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: twpsk
Source-Version: 4.0-2.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
twpsk, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 714670@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luk Claes <luk@debian.org> (supplier of updated twpsk package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 18:09:20 +0200
Source: twpsk
Binary: twpsk
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.0-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Hamradio Maintainers <debian-hams@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>
Description: 
 twpsk      - Soundcard-based X program for operating PSK31
Closes: 714670
Changes: 
 twpsk (4.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Transition from lesstif2 to motif (Closes: #714670).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 a2aba1aec13b874d829af1401257ec2697265f6a 1844 twpsk_4.0-2.1.dsc
 21fa125b63e280f567ec0e765ae24a848e517641 5699 twpsk_4.0-2.1.debian.tar.gz
 bf3902fbd4d34b90c7bfdc7a69cdd0dfcf0c4012 68670 twpsk_4.0-2.1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 0865f38ef8ee14fe01d3734bc0698da02dc90c651d2f16b82e3964d50f8c52c0 1844 twpsk_4.0-2.1.dsc
 8d30418ed707b9f3e8a8b3142ad2ec9e9197a7ba015aaf4f8842673fbaf47ac1 5699 twpsk_4.0-2.1.debian.tar.gz
 09d8d85265bac5a99112c0797e809eb7807bd31ab2e694902801760620607e64 68670 twpsk_4.0-2.1_amd64.deb
Files: 
 5285c5d7166e695f1b4ed327600d8c86 1844 hamradio optional twpsk_4.0-2.1.dsc
 1c79085fa311c01c89fce47138d60ba7 5699 hamradio optional twpsk_4.0-2.1.debian.tar.gz
 73fe75ad99f5307e87a07127e09e14e9 68670 hamradio optional twpsk_4.0-2.1_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
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=cJKL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: