Bug#630893: [PATCH] Relicense listen/ripdump.c to permit commercial use and distribution
- To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>, 630893@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Patrick Ouellette <pouelle@debian.org>, 630894@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#630893: [PATCH] Relicense listen/ripdump.c to permit commercial use and distribution
- From: Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 10:10:40 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120806081040.GA21245@spike.0x539.de>
- Reply-to: Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org>, 630893@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20120429054750.GA24711@burratino>
- References: <20120303221619.11745.40892.reportbug@hawking> <20120305233212.GA7349@flying-gecko.net> <4F65D70F.1070104@elmundolibre.be> <20120318214128.GA18464@flying-gecko.net> <CAPGNwVu0uUar4nnzUhQjSaXBuO+HKCuMrBG5fSE_ReP45oKzPg@mail.gmail.com> <4F6780C6.9010702@elmundolibre.be> <CAPGNwVukVuz4iD7tfV8+8BccgPQoEbcm+Cuuurvd4mQQTVDZXQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120428054803.GA30191@burratino> <20120429010426.GA18050@flying-gecko.net> <20120429054750.GA24711@burratino>
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:47:50AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Patrick Ouellette wrote:
>
> > What about just noting the license for ripdump.c is now BSD?
>
> I assume that means you think the patch to listen/ripdump.c
> itself is ok. A changelog entry stating
>
> * The permission notice in listen/ripdump.c has been changed to
> use the BSD license.
>
> or whatever wording is preferred sounds fine to me.
What's blocking this clarification from reaching the archive?
Furthermore: ax25spyd was removed unnecessarily in the end, should it be
reintroduced?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: