Hi, 在 2022-05-12星期四的 16:33 -0400，Boyuan Yang写道： > Dear Debian GTK/GNOME Team members, > > I maintain some software that needs 3.x version of libsigc++ library in > its > newer releases[1]. However, only the 2.x branch is available in Debian > [2]. > As a result, I am wondering if it's okay for us to package the 3.x branch. > > I have prepared a packaging repo at [3] with completed packaging > instruction > and copyright review. I am wondering if it's okay to maintain libsigc++- > 3.0 > under Debian GNOME Team similar to the 2.x branch package, or if I should > place the packaging repo under salsa.debian.org/debian/ and have it > uploaded > to NEW queue for review first. > > If you find any issues with my packaging scripts, please let me know > (ideally with a patch). Any suggestion would be appreciated. A known issue > is the Uploader substitution in control.in for GNOME team and I haven't > figured out the solution, but this should be a minor problem. > > Thanks, > Boyuan > > [1] https://github.com/wwmm/easyeffects/issues/1000 > [2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libsigc++-2.0 > [3] https://salsa.debian.org/byang/libsigcplusplus-3.0 Just an update: this is now in Debian Sid: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libsigc++-3.0 . The git packaging repo is at https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libsigcplusplus-3.0 . Feel free to make any updates that you find necessary. Thanks, Boyuan Yang
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part