Dear Debian GTK/GNOME Team members, I maintain some software that needs 3.x version of libsigc++ library in its newer releases[1]. However, only the 2.x branch is available in Debian [2]. As a result, I am wondering if it's okay for us to package the 3.x branch. I have prepared a packaging repo at [3] with completed packaging instruction and copyright review. I am wondering if it's okay to maintain libsigc++-3.0 under Debian GNOME Team similar to the 2.x branch package, or if I should place the packaging repo under salsa.debian.org/debian/ and have it uploaded to NEW queue for review first. If you find any issues with my packaging scripts, please let me know (ideally with a patch). Any suggestion would be appreciated. A known issue is the Uploader substitution in control.in for GNOME team and I haven't figured out the solution, but this should be a minor problem. Thanks, Boyuan [1] https://github.com/wwmm/easyeffects/issues/1000 [2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libsigc++-2.0 [3] https://salsa.debian.org/byang/libsigcplusplus-3.0
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part