Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > Sjoerd proposed to replace acme_error by g_warning; it *is* trivial.
> > Patch attached.
>
> This patch fails as-is, because another patch removes that code fragment.
Yes, it was done a bit too fast, Sjoerd pointed this in a later mail
and announced he has a correct patch in his local package.
Frederic