Re: imlib1 and gdk-imlib1 to be removed
This would also make enlightenment uninstallable.
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:09:54PM +0200, joss@debian.org wrote:
>
> > This is an automatically generated report. The gdk-imlib1 package depends
> > on libpng2, libpng10-0 or libpng3. It should be rebuilt against the latest
> > libpng 1.2 packages, so that libpng 1.0 can safely be removed from the
> > archive.
>
>
> Since gdk-imlib1 must be built with libpng2, my proposal is to ask for
> the removal of imlib1 and gdk-imlib1.
>
> Since gdk-imlib1 underlies basically all of GNOME1, that will force
> the removal of GNOME1 as was previously mooted:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-gtk-gnome/2005/06/msg00027.html
>
> Is this okay with the GNOME maintainers? If not, would one or more
> of you like to adopt these packages?
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/289790
> http://bugs.debian.org/289789
>
> Thanks,
> -Steve
Chipzz AKA
Jan Van Buggenhout
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNIX isn't dead - It just smells funny
Chipzz@ULYSSIS.Org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Baldric, you wouldn't recognize a subtle plan if it painted itself pur-
ple and danced naked on a harpsicord singing 'subtle plans are here a-
gain'."
Reply to: