Re: Upload of GNOME 2.8 to unstable
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 09:33:02PM +0000, Robert Hart wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 22:04 +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > It could probably be arch: all too, and tasksel modified to check for a 2.6
> > kernel, and install it instead of m-g2 in case a 2.6 kernel is detected.
>
> Doesn't this all need to be done at runtime? Isn't it relatively common
Yes, at post d-i reboot runtime, which will most assuredly run the kernel that
was chosen during d-i.
> for people to have both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels installed? The package
Only for advanced users, and they know how to handle this situation.
> manager wont have a clue which one is actually booted, or which one
> would be used most often.... Or am I abnormal?
`uname -r` will give you the needed output.
> Or is this all just to get a sane default install?
Yep.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: