Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Just curious, is there some reason udebs are not included in the normal > binary target in rules? I notice i386 and ppc have them in the archive, > should I be worried about putting them in here too? I suppose you're talking about the glib udebs and such that were made for the as of yet not usable graphical d-i frontend. The best way to build udebs currently is to use a recent version of debhelper, put XC-Package-Type: udeb in the udeb's stanza of debian/rules, let the standard build target bild it using all standard debhelper commands, and that will take care of most everything needed to make a fine policy-incompliant udeb. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature