[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gnome problem after apt-get upgrade



Just to be sure, when you say remove all that crap do you mean
apt-get remove the packages that install those libraries. (libgtk2.0, libglib2.0, libatk1.0, and libpango1.0) Just wondering because it looks like this will also remove a lot of
other packages that depend on these.
Sorry I am sort of new to this.

Thanks


From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
To: willy fredrick <mevsme2@hotmail.com>
CC: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gnome problem after apt-get upgrade
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:00:57 +0200

Le mar 22/06/2004 à 19:55, willy fredrick a écrit :
> root@myputer:~# ldd /usr/bin/gpdf
>         libgthread-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0
> (0x40476000)
>         libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
> (0x409f5000)
>         libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
> (0x40d67000)
>         libatk-1.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 (0x40dc8000)
>         libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
> (0x40de0000)
> libpangoxft-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so.0 (0x40e13000) > libpangox-1.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpangox-1.0.so.0 (0x40e19000) > libpango-1.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 (0x40e25000)
>         libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
> (0x40e55000)
>         libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0
> (0x40e84000)
>         libglib-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x40e8b000)

Just remove all that crap and it should be fine.
--
 .''`.           Josselin Mouette        /\./\
: :' :           josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org
`. `'                        joss@debian.org
  `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
<< signature.asc >>

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 9 Dial-up Internet Access fights spam and pop-ups ? now 3 months FREE! http://join.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200361ave/direct/01/



Reply to: