[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Good way to write GNOME (packaging issue)



On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 02:37, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
>  > So, the right way to write it is GNOME (GNOME 2), we should probably use
>  > it in all the packages's descriptions (same for GTK+).
>  > 
>  > Any comment ? What do you people think about this ?
> 
>  *sigh*
> 
>  GNU Network Object Model Environment.
> 
>  GIMP Toolkit.

(I presume you meant GIMP Tool Kit)

>  GNU Image Manipulation Program.

The counter-argument is that as acronyms enter common use, they drop the
uppercase and become just another work.  i.e., laser and many other
words I could think of if it wasn't 8 in the morning still.

However, I'm in the GNOME camp.

Ross
-- 
Ross Burton                                 mail: ross@burtonini.com
                                          jabber: ross@burtonini.com
                                     www: http://www.burtonini.com./
 PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: