Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org> writes: > Good remark from tbm (http://bugs.debian.org/253466): > > "It seems there is lots of inconsistency about how "Gnome"/"GNOME" is > spelled. Maybe you can raise this issue on the debian gnome list and > get peopl to agree on one spelling?" > > So, the right way to write it is GNOME (GNOME 2), we should probably use > it in all the packages's descriptions (same for GTK+). > > Any comment ? What do you people think about this ? GNOME sounds right. Marc -- $_=')(hBCdzVnS})3..0}_$;//::niam/s~=)]3[))_$(rellac(=_$({pam(esrever })e$.)4/3* )e$(htgnel+23(rhc,"u"(kcapnu ,""nioj ;|_- |/+9-0z-aZ-A|rt~=e$;_$=e${pam tnirp{y V2ajFGabus} yV2ajFGa&{gwmclBHIbus}gwmclBHI&{yVGa09mbbus}yVGa09mb&{hBCdzVnSbus'; s/\n//g;s/bus/\nbus/g;eval scalar reverse # <mailto:marc@marcbrockschmidt.de>
Attachment:
pgp9iXBjCmkbJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature