[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable

On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 03:38:08PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 10:45:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 04:13:22PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > What about setting up a parallel autobuilder chain for experimental,
> > 
> > Sure, that'd be great.
> Although not easy. I'm not sure about this (haven't done any
> experiments, maybe I should), but I suspect wanna-build does not handle
> incomplete distributions (as experimental is one) very well.

  What about making experimental "chunks". I mean, right now we have in
  experimental gnome 2.6 and libtool (for example). Trying to autobuild 
  that means choosing among unstable libtool and experimental libtool,
  which is broken ATM.

  IMHO this could be fixed if we had experimental/gnome2.6 and
  experimental/libtool, which are diferent subsets of experimental. The
  policy should say that each subset should be autocontained in addition
  with unstable. This means that experimental/gnome2.6 will be built
  with packages there in and unstable versions for those that are not in
  that subset.

  Will this make the trick?

Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: