Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable

To: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable
From: Jean-Christophe Dubacq <jean-christophe.dubacq@ens-lyon.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 00:27:09 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040417222709.GA1774@penpen.mine.nu>
Mail-followup-to: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040417220954.GQ969@perkypants.org>
References: <[🔎] 20040415221000.GC30253@nubol.int.oskuro.net> <[🔎] 20040417165713.GA878@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net> <[🔎] 20040417220954.GQ969@perkypants.org>

On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 08:09:54AM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>   * 2.4 is known to be good in testing

The FAM bug exists in 2.4 and is quite awful. Can render floppies
ununmountable. Corrected in 2.6, apparently.

My 2 cents

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable
  - From: Jeff Waugh <jdub@perkypants.org>

References:
- Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable
  - From: Jordi Mallach <jordi@debian.org>
- Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable
  - From: Jeff Waugh <jdub@perkypants.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable
Next by Date: Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable
Previous by thread: Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable
Next by thread: Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread