Re: liborbit2-dev and liblinc devel files
- To: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: liborbit2-dev and liblinc devel files
- From: Johannes Rohr <j.rohr@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 14:01:53 +0100
- Message-id: <874qxs9ozi.fsf@rudi.3linden.net>
- In-reply-to: <KwXX.55A.13@gated-at.bofh.it> (Christian Marillat's message of "Sat, 25 Oct 2003 15:50:13 +0200")
- References: <Kw1O.3Qj.5@gated-at.bofh.it> <KwXX.55A.13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Christian Marillat <marillat.christian@wanadoo.fr> writes:
> Chipzz <chipzz@ULYSSIS.Org> writes:
>
>> On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Jeremy Nickurak wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> What package contains/will-contain/should-contain /usr/lib/liblinc.a ?
>>
>> First of all, it's liblinc.la (an l before the a), liblinc.a is a very
>> different thing.
>
> Yes typo.
>
>> Second, no package should contain it. The libraries that refer to
>> liblinc.la should be recompiled.
>
> Actually in Debian no -dev packages needed by others packages contains
> this string.
But gstreamer-gconf contains it (/usr/lib/libgstgconf-0.6.la), and this
currently makes it impossible to build nautilus-media in
unstable.
Yesterday I filed a bug against gstreamer-gconf, severity
"important". I wonder if "serious" would have been more appropriate
("Breaks unrelated software").
Thanks,
Johannes
--
~/.signature under construction
Reply to: