Re: libgtop2 fixed packages available (solves applet mess).

[Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>]

On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 04:18:47PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Now, when first building the fixed libgtop2.0-1, libgtop-2.0.so.1.0.1 was
> > linked not against the libgtop_common-2.0.so.1 and
> > libgtop_sysdeps-2.0.so.1 which are also in the libgtop2 package, but
> > against the system installed libgtop_common-2.0.so.0 and
> > libgtop_sysdeps-2.0.so.0, which naturally were no more available when i
> > installed the fixed package, and thus it was not really fixed. A second
> > built resulted in the fixed packages i posted, but if i upload this to
> > unstable, i will get loads of FTBFS, which would not be nice. I could
> > build-conflict with libgtop2-dev (<< 2.0.2-1.1) or something such, but i
> > don't think this is a good solution.
> >
> > I have quickly looked at the build system, but i am very unfamiliar with
> > libtool and the various .am/.in stuff, so i would like it a lot if
> > someone other took over from there and provided me with a build fix.
> >
> > So, i have tried to contact upstrem, which as Bastien Nocera pointed out
> > is not the one actually listed in either copyright or AUTHORS, and hope
> > they will provide a fix to this.
> 
> Nothing related to upstream with this libtool feature. Search for glade
> in that archive list for an answer.

Huh ? care to clarify this a bit ?

I suppose you mean that it is libtool who is using the installed version
of the libraries at build time, and that this is a bug in libtool ? 

A bug which did already happen for glade, and a
solution/explanation/whatever can be found in 'that' mailing list ?
which one, debian-gtk-gnome ?

Friendly,

Sven Luther