Re: evolution 1.4 preview on debian
On Mit, 2003-03-26 at 21:16, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 20:51, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Mit, 2003-03-26 at 02:26, Evan Martin wrote:
> >
> > > - there's some conflict between a header in libgal and an Evolution
> > > header. they looked like they were both trying to prototype the same
> > > function.
> >
> > Didn't encounter this, maybe because I used a post 1.3.1 CVS snapshot of
> > evolution.
Now I have encountered this. :\ Looks like e_notice was moved from gal
to evolution, so I'm building a gal CVS snapshot as well.
> > Now the question is how to make what I have (a bunch of hacked up
> > packages built from CVS snapshots) public without embarassing myself too
> > much. :) I guess I'll take a while to put up slightly cleaned up source
> > packages, please bear with me as I'm generally very busy at the moment.
>
> Since they wouldn't be official Debian packages anyway, I'd say just
> throw them together for now so people can get at them. Just put a very
> big disclaimer up saying that they may not, and most likely WILL not
> work for everyone. Then you can clean it up later. :)
I'll do something along those lines. The problem is I need to clean them
up for them to even have a chance to build for someone else. :) I'm
afraid my powerpc binaries aren't useful to most people here, and
they're rather big for distribution anyway as I don't strip the
evolution binaries. I'll do my best to provide source packages ASAP.
> Oh, and since we're on the X-Mailer subject, check mine as well. :) I
> built from the actual tarballs, though I'm thinking of rebuilding from
> CVS soon to see if some of the little quirks have been taken care of
> yet.
It looks like some of the quirks are being taken care of indeed. :)
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
Reply to: