Re: famd and mount

To: Enver ALTIN <enver.altin@frontsite.com.tr>
Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: famd and mount
From: Jacob Emcken <jacob@emcken.dk>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 12:08:59 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 3FAB7D4B.5060109@emcken.dk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1068202425.989.20.camel@skyblue.office.frontsite.com.tr>
References: <[🔎] 1068149210.1189.4.camel@nahoo> <[🔎] 1068152541.17095.6.camel@arrakis.localnet> <[🔎] 3FAACB19.2080002@emcken.dk> <[🔎] 1068157970.17095.9.camel@arrakis.localnet> <[🔎] 20031106235600.GB15873@racsa.co.cr> <[🔎] 1068202425.989.20.camel@skyblue.office.frontsite.com.tr>

Enver ALTIN wrote:

On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 01:56, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:

fam is not as bad as some people here seem to think.  It's much more
efficient than just wildly poll directories.



I believe this is fixed at some stage back in nautilus 2.3 beta series.
What's the GNOME release we're talking about? sarge/sid?


I'm using Debian Sid and this is what I have installed

ii  libnautilus2-2      2.4.1-3
ii  nautilus            2.4.1-3
ii  nautilus-cd-burner  0.5.3-2
ii  nautilus-data       2.4.1-3
ii  nautilus-media      0.3.0-2

I have only noticed problems with Samba shares, but rarely uses cdromsand I don't have a floppy drive.


--Jacob

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: famd and mount
  - From: Enver ALTIN <enver.altin@frontsite.com.tr>

References:
- famd and mount
  - From: Ruben Porras <nahoo@inicia.es>
- Re: famd and mount
  - From: Josselin Mouette <josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org>
- Re: famd and mount
  - From: Jacob Emcken <jacob@emcken.dk>
- Re: famd and mount
  - From: Josselin Mouette <josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org>
- Re: famd and mount
  - From: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@debian.org>
- Re: famd and mount
  - From: Enver ALTIN <enver.altin@frontsite.com.tr>

Prev by Date: Re: famd and mount
Next by Date: Re: famd and mount
Previous by thread: Re: famd and mount
Next by thread: Re: famd and mount
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread