Re: Arrgh! Nautilus stalled again?!?
- To: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Arrgh! Nautilus stalled again?!?
- From: Johannes Rohr <j.rohr@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 11:35:14 +0200
- Message-id: <87k77avlwt.fsf@rudi.3linden.net>
- In-reply-to: <FsrY.2KZ.11@gated-at.bofh.it> (Sebastien Bacher's message of "Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:00:14 +0200")
- References: <FqJs.4Z.9@gated-at.bofh.it> <FsrY.2KZ.11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org> writes:
> Johannes Rohr <j.rohr@gmx.de> writes:
>
>> manually overrides these conflicts? Rubrica is pretty much alpha
>> quality software. Temporary removing it from testing should be an
>> acceptable choice!
>
> I disagree with the alpha part,
I've tested it quite briefly. If my judgement is unjustified, I
apologize.
> but rubrica testing removal has been
> asked 3 days ago to avoid this blockage.
Alas, the removal has yet to happen. :-(((
>> For libxslt1-python2.2 I read:
>>
>> libxslt1-python2.2 is confusing ( in unstable, 1.0.30-3 in testing)
>
> I don't know for thus part ..
That's a package on which the old rubrica package in testing depends
on. Unstable has libxslt1-python2.3 instead. So it all comes down to
rubrica.
Ciao,
Johannes
--
~/.signature under construction
Reply to: