[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Gnome 2.4 for Sid; done



Hi,

  The top panel disappears and never comes out again after "auto hiding"
  enabled. This problem still exists when gnome is started with a newly
  created user.

Regards
Wang WenRui


On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 04:26:52PM +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Christian Marillat <marillat.christian@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> > Packaging 2.4 take exactly one day. We don't need 2 months to push
> > 2.4 in unstable.
> 
> and was right.
> 
> Josselin Mouette <josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org> answered:
> > Debian is not about providing crappy packages in one day. We are
> > committed to provide a high-quality distribution, and it of course
> > requires high-quality packages. Not one-day packages.
> 
> and was right.
> 
> 
> But lots of people wants to play with Gnome 2.4 and its wonderful
> gnome-about application so I did it.
> 
> I coordinated myself here:
>   http://www.entrouvert.be/~fred/gnome-2.4/gnome-2.4-summary.html
> 
> (list created from http://www.gnome.org/start/2.4/notes/rninstallation.html)
> 
> And produced debs (only for i386) that are available with:
>   deb http://apt.bxlug.be/ gnome2.4-sid/
> 
> The process was to download current Debian package and current Gnome
> release and to apply patches from the first to the second.
> 
> Random notes:
> 
>  - built against XFree86 4.3 from experimental
>  - not Debian-quality packages
>  - upgrade fails; need to run apt-get -f install once to correct some
>    overwriting files
>  - tries not to diverge from sid packages but:
>    - librsvg now depends on libcroco (I thought it was necessary)
>    - libbonobo creates both libbonobo and bonobo-activation packages
>    - control-center builds fontilus and I put themus in a separate
>      package
>  - sources are available on http://apt.bxlug.be/gnome2.4-sid/sources
>    but my upload rate is low so I sometimes only uploaded the .diff.gz
>    and not the upstream .tar.gz
>  - Gnome 2.4 feels faster on my computer and I'm happy with it
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
>         Frederic
> 




Reply to: