Yes, I think a separate repository is a good idea to people test Gnome 2.4, without break the current gnome in sid... On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 07:51:23 +0200 Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:33:42PM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > <quote who="Julien Portalier"> > > > > > I'm not sure of that, for the moment we want to see Gnome 2.2 in > > > testing so i don't think we should upload Gnome 2.4 right now. > > > > > > But having it prepared in experimental might be a good idea. > > > > > > What do Gnome maintainers say ? > > > > I agree, given the state of testing. More important to get that stable > > than having pre-2.4 stuff in sid. Experimental, or a separate > > repository would be ideal. > > I would vote for a repository, it is too easy to get random not wanted > stuff from experimental together with what you really want. > > In truth, we would need a group of smaller experimental repositories, > with autobuilders attached too. > > Friendly, > > Sven Luther > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-request@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmaster@lists.debian.org > -- André Filipe de Assunção e Brito decko em #debian-br @ irc.debian.org ICQ#45427385 / JabberID: decko@jabbet.at Sitio == http://filipebrito.blogspot.com Camarada Socialista Engenheiro de Final de Semana Artista de Rua Tradutor solidário CIPSGA - Software Livre no Brasil -> http://www.cipsga.org.br Projeto Debian-BR -> http://www.debian-br.org Projeto Debian-SP -> http://sp.debian-br.org
Attachment:
pgpg6aIWlGDSQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature