Le ven 01/08/2003 à 10:25, Ghe Rivero a écrit : > Hi people! > > Sorry for my delayed, but my access to inet in the last days is really > limited. You're welcome. > El vie, 01-08-2003 a las 01:33, Roberto Majadas escribió: > > El vie, 01-08-2003 a las 03:38, JérÃŽme Warnier escribió: > > > Le ven 01/08/2003 à 02:12, Roberto Majadas a écrit : > > > > El vie, 01-08-2003 a las 01:59, JérÃŽme Warnier escribió: > > > > > Le ven 01/08/2003 à 01:12, Roberto Majadas a écrit : > > > > > > Hi debian-devel : > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm a board member of hispalinux [1] , and actually we are working very > > > > > > hard on metadistros project. This project [1] will be a perfect platform > > > > > > for develop cumstomizated debian distros. Now , we are making the XD2 > > > > > > debian packages for integrate them in the metadistros project. This > > > > > > packages , like metadistros, will be debian woody compatible. An member > > > > > > of hispalinux lend us a server (P4-2GHz 512 ram 50Gb HD) for to work on > > > > > > it. Actually , Ghe Riveiro [3] is working and coordinating it. If > > > > > > anybody is interested on it , please contact with Ghe [3]. Any > > > > > > contribution is welcome. > > > > > What would bring the XD2 for Woody compared to the GNOME 2.2 backport > > > > > already widely available? > > > > > > > > XD2 in respect of gnome2.2 is more integrated , more eye-candy for the > > > > final user. XD2 has a integrated system for printer's configuration , an > > > > OpenOffice(1.0.2) integrated with gnome (theme, icons, gnome-vfs ...) , > > > > Evolution 1.4 , and other things . Please look at > > > > http://www.ximian.com/products/desktop/features.html > > > I know all that. > > > I was wondering if you planned to make some Ximian patches (the ones > > > that could be accepted anyway) available in Debian or just a > > > quick-and-dirty packaging effort. > > > > > > > Quick yes , dirty not :) . We need this packages for serveral reasons. > > We use debian and metadistros for to show linux , debian and free > > software to the people. We can show debian woody with gnome1.4 :). And > > we can wait to the next release of debian, because we need a metadistro > > with a beatiful desktop on 15th september 2001, because we ha a national > > conference of linux users (in spain) on 23,24,25 september. This year > > may be can come to the conference 2000 persons or more. And we have more > > events along this year as important as the other one. > > Other reason is the installation of 300 WorkStations with Debian in my > university. Of course, i'm going to install Debian, but the desktops > that came with Woody are not the best ones (For me are really cool, but > not for students that the only thing that know about linux is the > "fucking, stupid and fat penguin") Ok, I undestand better now. But why not put an effort to help the quick release of Sarge instead? Or at least, help the maintainers of some packages to get the latest releases from Sid into Sarge? I lately personally involved myself in the backport of GNOME 2.2 with James Strandboge, and I'm already commited with the Debian packages of OOo for a long time (one year or so, since the beginning). > > > > > What kind of work are you going to do? > > > > > > > > I think ghe can replay you better than me , i'm not a debian developer > > > > :) but basically we are including the ximian-patches into the gnome2.2 > > > > backported packages . > > > Could you ask him? > > We (Just me for the moment) are taking the port of Gnome2.2 for Woody > like the base, and just applying the patches and recompiling the > packages (actually it is not so easy). We want to change the Woody base > as little as possible, so we are downgrouding some dependencies (as > debhelper, and things like that). Apart of this, we are using the ports > of Branden XFree4.2 packages for Woody for the moment (deb > http://people.debian.org/~frankie/debian woody/x421/) but we are waiting > to a realase of 4.3. About the dependencies, just take a look at how many bug reports I submitted to lower the dependencies versions in official packages when it was not necessary. For the debhelper question, on the contrary, I was finally convinced that using a backported debhelper is mandatory, because of the new cdbs which is used in newer packages in Sid. I just had a discussion about it with James a few days ago and concluded it wasn't worth. A thing that needs work, I think, is the integration of Ximian patches to OOo. I just started yesterday with this, you can find more information here: http://glasnost.beeznest.org/rubrics/12. I know exactly what you mean when you say it's not that easy. I think we should work together, because we are doing similar things. How could we do that? Should we create a mailing-list or what? I can provide that if needed (on http://glasnost.beeznest.org or on http://www.bxlug.be). James, what do you think, do you jump too? > Any other question is welcomed. > > Ghe Rivero > > > > I has CC the last mail to him. And this one too :) > > > > Roberto > > > > > > > > > Roberto > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for all > > > > > > > > > > > > Roberto Majadas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] http://www.hispalinux.es > > > > > > [2] http://metadistros.hispalinux.es > > > > > > [3] mailto: ghe_rivero@ranty.pantax.net -- Jérôme Warnier <jwarnier@beeznest.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=