Re: What's up on arm? (/usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to `XineramaIsActive')
- To: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: What's up on arm? (/usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to `XineramaIsActive')
- From: Johannes Rohr <j.rohr@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 23:45:22 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87vfu0omj1.fsf@comlink.apc.org>
- In-reply-to: <agGl.4UC.9@gated-at.bofh.it> (Christian Marillat's message of "Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:10:09 +0200")
- References: <agn1.4De.25@gated-at.bofh.it> <agGl.4UC.9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Christian Marillat <marillat.christian@wanadoo.fr> writes:
>> Are there known issues with Xinerama on arm? Is there a workaround for
>> Gnome packages, like e.g. disabling Xinerama support on arm?
>
> Nothing related to Gnome but the guilty is GTK 2.0
>
> ,----
> | gtk+2.0 (2.2.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
> |
> | * debian/control:
> | - changed a section for libgtk2.0-dbg to libdevel.
> | * debian/patches/000_gtk+-debian-aclocal.patch:
> | - applied to fix Xinerama library linkage broken on arm and m68k.
> | (closes: Bug#190569)
> | Thanks to James Troup and Phil Blundell.
> |
> | -- Akira TAGOH <tagoh@debian.org> Sat, 3 May 2003 01:50:52 +0900
> `----
>
> Wrong patch ?
That upload is already pretty old, isn't it? Maybe the fix has worked
in the meantime but stopped doing so recently because some other
circumstances have changed?!?
Could someone drop a note on debian-gtk-gnome when Gtk+2.0 is finally
fixed? Akira?
Thanks,
Johannes
Reply to: