Re: Two gnome-vfs-extras packages?

To: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Two gnome-vfs-extras packages?
From: Jeff Waugh <jdub@perkypants.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 11:08:38 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030301000838.GB26350@lazarus>
Mail-followup-to: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] b3or5f$av$1@main.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] b3or5f$av$1@main.gmane.org>

<quote who="Michael Toomim">

> Why are there two gnome-vfs-extras packages in unstable?  One has the 2
> suffix, and the other doesn't.  It looks like the 2 suffix one is about a
> year newer than the other one.

gnome-vfs-extras is for gnome-vfs 1.x
gnome-vfs-extras2 is for gnome-vfs 2.x

The *2, in this case, is pretty much the sanest solution.

- Jeff

-- 
      "And, most importantly, we now have modules named 'fontilus' and      
        'themus' -- the two founders of GROME." - Jonathon Blandford

Reply to:

References:
- Two gnome-vfs-extras packages?
  - From: Michael Toomim <toomim@uclink4.berkeley.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Two gnome-vfs-extras packages?
Previous by thread: Re: Two gnome-vfs-extras packages?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread