Re: XFT and GNOME 2
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Sven Luther wrote:
> From: Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
> Subject: Re: XFT and GNOME 2
>
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 06:55:21AM +0100, Chipzz wrote:
> > On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> >
> > > From: Havoc Pennington <hp@redhat.com>
> > > Subject: Re: XFT and GNOME 2
> > >
> > > On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:20:41PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> > > > I'd like for this to just work out of the box. Unfortunately the only
> > > > thing exceeding my desire to get things working is my lack of time to do
> > > > it; however I expect I'll find some time to go poking around if I'm
> > > > given some pointers to XFT resources.
> > > >
> > > > Is there any particular reason why the list of XFT fonts isn't a
> > > > superset of the non-XFT fonts in GNOME?
> > >
> > > You don't want all the old X fonts listed in fontconfig, because
> >
> > Err, fontconfig is for the new pango which isn't in debian yet ;)
>
> But which has chances to be part of sarge. The new gnome is scheduled
> for release in january, is it not ?
Yes, but if you reread the originals posters post, you'll notice it's
about the current debian packages (or at least, that's what the original
post suggests).
Ah well, this whole dicsussion is getting pretty pointless, isn't it? ;)
Kind regards,
Chipzz AKA
Jan Van Buggenhout
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNIX isn't dead - It just smells funny
Chipzz@ULYSSIS.Org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: