On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 01:44, Jordi Mallach wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 11:58:03PM +0200, q@nupi.com wrote: > > gtk-engines-cleanice2 - CleanIce theme for GTK+ 2.x > > gtk-engines-mgicchikn - Magic Chicken theme for GTK+ 2.x > > gtk2-engines-thinice - ThinIce theme for GTK+ 2.0 > > gtk2.0-engines-metal - Metallic theme for GTK+ 2.0 > > gtk2.0-engines-pixbuf - Pixbuf-based theme for GTK+ 2.0 > > gtk2.0-engines-redmond95 - Windows-like theme for GTK+ 2.0 > > > > what about a naming scheme for gtk2 engines: gtk2-engines-*? > > I wanted to propose this before the first engines were uploaded. I > forgot, and then it was too late. I also vote for gtk2-engines-foo. > (unless gtk2.0-engines-foo makes more sense, in terms of incompatibility > between gtk2.0 and gtk2.2 themes). 2.2 will be binary compatible with 2.0, so gtk2- makes sense. I'll try to go about fixing that for cleanice and magic chicken. Somebody can file bugs against these so I don't forget ? Cheers -- /Bastien Nocera http://hadess.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part