Re: New gnome-libs package build against libpng3
rmurray@debian.org writes:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 01:54:31AM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> > Is anyone working on moving libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2? libgda0, libgda-common,
> > bonobo and libglade-gnome0 from png2 to png3?
>
> I think libglade-gnome0 need to be NMUed, no maintainer upload since
> november 2001 (I'll do that). Takuo is still alive for bonobo and Akira
> for libgda0 too. Ryan is more or less inactive for libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2
> I don't know if a NMU is needed.
> No, I am not inactive. Who came up with the bright idea to break binary
Then why you don't package the latest gdm tarball ? I've filed a bug for
this new release 90 days ago and never got any reply.
> compatibility in gnome1, which breaks compatibility with other distros and
> third party software? Can someone give me a really _GOOD_ reason why I
> want to do this? For Gnome2, other distros and third party software can
> use png3. Leave gnome1 at png2.
The goal for sarge is to switch to libpng3
Christian
Reply to: