Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we

To: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we
From: Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 13:30:31 -0400 (EDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] 200208081730.NAA08205@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>

Bastien,
   Okay, I filed a bug report against gnome-gv on this one. It appears
they have a bogus build depends on gdk-imlib-dev that can be dropped.
                                      Jack

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we
  - From: Christian Marillat <marillat.christian@wanadoo.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we
Next by Date: Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we
Previous by thread: Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we
Next by thread: Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread