Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we

[Christian Marillat <marillat.christian@wanadoo.fr>]

Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> writes:

>      Well ignoring xchat for the moment, what is the 
> plan for imlib itself in sid. I noticed there was
> an attempt to build it against libpng3-dev in the -5
> version which got reversed in -6. However it is still
> being built with libglib/gtk+1.2. What is upstreams
> intention on this? I would think that a migration to
> libglib/gtk+ 2.0 would be in the works no? Would there
> be two different versioned copies of imlib? One for
> glib/gtk+ 1.2 and one for 2.0?

Read :

http://lists.debian.org/debian-gtk-gnome/2002/debian-gtk-gnome-200207/msg00180.html

Christian