Re: esound 0.2.28

To: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Cc: rmurray@debian.org
Subject: Re: esound 0.2.28
From: Christian Marillat <marillat.christian@wanadoo.fr>
Date: 27 Jun 2002 11:38:30 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87y9d1njs9.fsf@falcon.wanadoo.fr>
Mail-followup-to: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Reply-to: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020624101716.Y5037@cyberhqz.com>
References: <[🔎] 1024628548.30122.1.camel@spike> <[🔎] 1024677256.674.10.camel@atenea> <[🔎] 20020624083854.X5037@cyberhqz.com> <[🔎] 1024938798.1872.66.camel@atenea> <[🔎] 20020624101716.Y5037@cyberhqz.com>

>> "r" == rmurray  <rmurray@debian.org> writes:

[...]

>> Debian esound 0.2.27 is broken. Try running esound from command line

> It's an NMU to experimental that I had no knowledge of beforehand.

It is possible to see 0.2.28 in unstable ?

I did a bug report 63 days ago about a new upstream release...

Christian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: esound 0.2.28
  - From: Ryan Murray <rmurray@cyberhqz.com>

References:
- esound 0.2.28
  - From: Takuo KITAME <kitame@northeye.org>
- Re: esound 0.2.28
  - From: Santiago Otero <santiago@atlas.uvigo.es>
- Re: esound 0.2.28
  - From: rmurray@debian.org
- Re: esound 0.2.28
  - From: Santiago Otero <santiago@atlas.uvigo.es>
- Re: esound 0.2.28
  - From: rmurray@debian.org

Prev by Date: Re: esound 0.2.28
Next by Date: Re: Broken repository? Or am I missing something?
Previous by thread: Re: esound 0.2.28
Next by thread: Re: esound 0.2.28
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread