On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 08:12, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 11:57:01 +0530 (IST) > Amardeep Singh <amardeep@iitg.ernet.in> wrote: > > > nautilus performance problems are well known and if you find it slow for > > your purpose, you best bet would be to use another file manager such as > > gmc, rox, or konqueror. On a positive note, nautilus2 (gnome2 version of > > nautilus) is extremely snappy. > I hope I'm right when I think "snappy" means "fast"... did some saint or angel > work on it? that seems like a miracle =) hehehe It's very usable on my g3 500, and no, it's not a miracle, some suboptimal functions were replaced by their longer-worked-on GTK+ equivalent. For example the own-grown anti-alias was replaced by XRender when it's available. Cheers -- /Bastien Nocera http://hadess.net
Attachment:
pgp54PRXDqPL0.pgp
Description: PGP signature