[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

/debian in upstream (was Re: Wow! I didn't know this list existed!)



Interesting pair of headers in the message I'm replying to:

> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 21:53:06 +1100
> Reply-By: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 21:42:41 +1000

Where did I put that time machine?  :-)

On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 09:53:06PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:

> I've spoken to Ben and Christian about having GNOME CVS access, to
> put /debian directories in CVS. This would be a big help to some
> developers. Has this happened yet?

In my experience, having the /debian dirs in CVS is not necessarily a
good idea.  In fact, it can be rather awkward, and difficult to manage
properly.  To be used effectively, a lot of the files in /debian would
need to be updated automatically by either the automake or autoconf
tools.  Setting this up to work right is non-trivial at this point.
(Even for some less-than-100% definition of "right".)

I have one package, WMRack, which I maintain completely: both the
"upstream" sources and the Debian packages.  But so far, I have found
it much easier to keep my "upstream" sources completely free of any
debian stuff.  And that's on a one-man project.

That's not to say that it can't be done -- in fact, it was done for
(IIRC) most of gnome 1.0.  But I don't think it was done well, and I'd
rather not repeat the experiment unless it can be made to work better
this time.

-- 
Chris Waters           |  Pneumonoultra-        osis is too long
xtifr@debian.org       |  microscopicsilico-    to fit into a single
or xtifr@speakeasy.net |  volcaniconi-          standalone haiku



Reply to: