Re: Woody source frustration!
>>>> "ACPI" == Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@mit.edu> writes:
[...]
>> I've fixed this bug in the 0.24-0.1 (NMU)
ACPI> Yes, thank you very much, I noticed. But the bug was never closed, so
ACPI> I had to get the source package to see the fix (instead of being
ACPI> notified about the bug closure).
Sorry, I've forgot to close this bug.
ACPI> * Uploading packages with unmet build dependencies. gtkhtml depends
ACPI> on libcapplet >= 1.3.0, which doesn't exist.
>> Fixed in the 0.7 release who doesn't compile withe the latest
>> gnome-print
ACPI> Right. So why update gnome-print if it breaks gtkhtml-0.7? This is
ACPI> exactly my point.
ACPI> * Building packages for i386 (and perhaps alpha) then uploading new
ACPI> dependencies which break new attempts to build. gtkhtml 0.6.1
ACPI> building is broken by bonobo 0.26 or later, so there is no gtkhtml for
ACPI> any arch outside of i386 and alpha, and there will be none until a new
ACPI> gtkhtml is uploaded.
>> See above.
ACPI> Right, as before, you uploaded a new package that broke an existing
ACPI> one. I'm not sure I see the logic there.
gtkhtml 0.7 was already broken before this upload. gtkhtml need gnome-print
0.23, who has never be packaged.
The soname for gnome-print 0.20 was 6, for 0.24 was 11
[...]
>> Nothing depends on gtkhtml (I've all the Gnome stuff installed)
ACPI> Uh, yes it does (look at the gnome-core Build-Depends, and
ACPI> configure.in). Could it be that the package was built without
ACPI> libgtkhtml-dev installed, so the part depending on it was not built?
ACPI> Or is this an extraneous dependency (in one of the few GNOME packages
ACPI> whose Build-Depends I didn't write :-)?
gtkhtml is needed by the gnome-help-browser binary, but isn't linked
dynamically but statically.
$ ls -l /usr/bin/gnome-help-browser
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 633916 nov 20 16:15 /usr/bin/gnome-help-browser
I've enabled --enable-gtkhtml-help for user's request.
[...]
ACPI> As a temporary workaround, I'll try building gnome-core without
ACPI> gtkhtml, so I at least have a functioning desktop.
I think this should work.
If this work I can remove --enable-gtkhtml-help and libgtkhtml dependencies.
Christian
Reply to: